::08:26:07::
::: Michael Vick, Guilty or Not Guilty? :::
By ~ MacKinzey
So today Michael Vick plead Guilty to dog fighting charges. Am I surprised? Heck no. Do I feel sorry for him? Heck no. I don’t understand why everyone is making him the victim. Like he didn’t know what he was doing. Talking about “I didn’t kill the dogs but I was there when it happened” or “I wasn’t betting on the fights but I was financing them”. Shut up! He’s the one who sent out the order to kill the dogs that didn’t perform. He was the master mind behind the whole operation and then folks have the nerve to make him sound like he had no idea what’s going on. My question is: Why should I feel sorry for him? Granted, he’s not the only dude in the world that participates in dogfights but like I said, he knew what he was doing. That whole situation could have been handled differently, euthanize those dogs instead of subjecting them to such gruesome executions. Interesting connection (of course I’m not insinuating anything), serial killers usually perfect their execution styles via torturing and killing animals. That goes to show that there is no remorse in taking a life, be it animal or whatever. Like those folks didn’t know that if you hold a dog underwater long enough or hang them long enough or shock them with a high enough current, would result in death. Ya’ll want to make the argument that their “just dogs” and mess. Well if that’s the case, why can you serve more time for animal cruelty than for beating the spit out of your wife? Explain the logic in that and then we’ll talk. I don’t want to hear about Poor Mike Vick being victimized by the legal system. Give me a break. Finding 55 dogs (really, who needs that many dogs) on property, admitted to killing 8 and you’re still going try to maintain your innocence? What? You didn’t bury the dogs but you bought plots for them? Be for real! |
|
|
|